December 26, 2018

Film Review: Bird Box


Whatever you do, don't open your eyes.

Academy Award-winning Danish director Susanne Bier’s Bird Box is a post-apocalyptic thriller that blends science fiction, horror, fantasy and the supernatural. Its greatest strength lies in what it withholds. There are no scary monsters stalking the landscape; instead, terror comes from unseen forces, eerie whispers and disturbing hallucinations.

(As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.)

Based on Josh Malerman’s 2014 novel, Bird Box: Don't Open Your Eyes, the film opens with Malorie Hayes (Sandra Bullock) and two young children making a desperate journey to safety. Blindfolded, they must navigate forests and a treacherous river while avoiding mysterious entities that drive anyone who sees them to madness and suicide.

Through a series of flashbacks, we learn how the catastrophe began. Pregnant and alone after the death of her sister, Malorie finds refuge with a small group of survivors, including the cynical Douglas (John Malkovich), the dependable Tom (Trevante Rhodes) and Olympia (Danielle Macdonald), who is also expecting a child. Five years later, with the world still in the grip of the unseen menace, Malorie, Tom and the children struggle to survive until a violent attack forces her and the youngsters onto the river.

Bier skillfully shifts between past and present, gradually revealing the story while sustaining tension. The flashbacks occasionally feel overused, but they never diminish the film’s suspense. What makes Bird Box so effective is its atmosphere. The unseen threat is far more unsettling than any conventional movie monster, while the survivors’ conflicting personalities add another layer of unpredictability. The mystery of what exactly lurks outside remains unresolved, but that uncertainty is part of the film’s appeal.

Stephen King described Bird Box as “riveting”, and I agree. Bier packs the film with relentless tension. She also explores how ordinary people respond when confronted with an unimaginable threat and the possibility of sudden death.

Bird Box by Josh Malerman book cover
From start to finish, this is Sandra Bullock’s film. She anchors the story with a convincing performance that captures fear, determination and vulnerability in equal measure. The supporting cast, particularly Rhodes and Malkovich, complements her well.

My only reservations were Malkovich’s somewhat one-note character and the credibility of Malorie and the children surviving a blindfolded journey through such hostile terrain. Neither, however, prevented me from thoroughly enjoying the film on Christmas Day.

10 comments:

  1. Prashant – While I don’t get into books and movies set in an apocalyptic future, I am a fan of Sandra Bullock. So, this one I will check out. Thanks.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Elgin, Bullock was part of the reason I watched BIRD BOX. Besides, I liked the premise of the film.

      Delete
  2. Prashant, my wife and I came home the other day and my girls were halfway through watching it. They continued, so it's kind of been ruined for us now.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Col, I hope I didn't spoil it for you. It's still worth watching.

      Delete
  3. I don't know how well I would like this, although I like reading post-apocalyptic fiction. But, since it is available through Netflix I may give it a try anyway.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Tracy, I like post-apocalyptic movies though I watch them for sheer entertainment. On the other hand, I haven't read a lot of post-apocalyptic fiction.

      Delete
  4. I'm glad you enjoyed this, Prashant. I've heard good things about it, and I'm not surprised that Sandra Bullock did such a good job of it. I'm not sure it's for me, I'll be honest, but it's certainly an interesting premise.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. That I did, Margot. Sandra Bullock brings a predictable intensity to the film, befitting her character and role. She is a fine actress.

      Delete
  5. I've only read the book (which was one of my favorites of the year), but I'm curious how it can be translated to screen. A large part of the terror comes from the fact that the reader can't see what is surrounding them any more than they can.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Kelly, it'd be the other way around for me since I haven't read the book. Horror films without real creatures and monsters scare me more than those without; the 1982 horror flick THE ENTITY is one example.

      Delete